Titolo: Editoriale
Autore: * [Alfredo M. Bonanno]
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagina 1
Riguarda la fine della terza serie di "Anarchismo" e l’inizio della quarta.
––––––––
Titolo: Una questione di metodo
Autore: Alfredo M. Bonanno
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 2-3
Chiuso nella gabbia delle proprie incertezze e dei propri luoghi comuni, anche il rivoluzionario si adagia sulle soluzioni più facili, finisce per accondiscendere agli atteggiamenti che consentono la produzione di un cliché. Per uscire da una situazione del genere bisognerebbe impiegare un metodo critico capace di individuare la reale consistenza di ogni nostra opinione.
––––––––
Titolo: Compromesso o trasformazione
Autore: Pierleone Porcu
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 4-5
La nostra disabitudine a riflettere e a mettere in questione il reale grado di conoscenza raggiunto si vede con chiarezza quando facciamo di tutto per non interrogarci in modo nuovo.
––––––––
Titolo: Dissociazione, amnistia e soluzioni affini
Autore: Alcuni compagni del Coordinamento Nazionale Anarchico contro la Repressione
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 6-11
Oggi il fenomeno della dissociazione, dell’amnistia e delle varie soluzioni politiche prospettate, non è importante valutarlo tanto nell’ambito circoscritto del circuito carcerario, quanto nel contesto più vasto del sociale, dove l’immissione di tali contenuti riformisti può provocare effetti e conseguenze funesti difficilmente prevedibili. Il problema del carcere e la ripresa delle lotte. Contro la logica del "reducismo" per una propositività nelle lotte sociali.
––––––––
Titolo: Al di là della protesta. Una critica radicale alla disobbedienza civile
Autore: Gary Moffatt
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 12-14
I limiti dell’attuale movimento pacifista. Cosa fare davanti al dilagante perbenismo nelle lotte sociali. Vecchi e nuovi preti al lavoro.
––––––––
Titolo: Per una milizia cittadina. Alternative anarchiche alla NATO e al Patto di Varsavia (parte terza)
Autore: First of May Group
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 15-29
La prima parte del presente lavoro è stata pubblicata su "Anarchismo" n. 42, pp. 29-38, la seconda parte sul n. 43, pp. 5-19 della stessa rivista.
––––––––
Titolo: De l’Anarchia. "Alessandro il Grande"
Autore: Pino Bertelli
Serie terza – anno 1984 – numero 44 – pagine 30-31
Le Bastiglie le abbattono i popoli, i governi le costruiscono e le conservano.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
clik to read index
Bimonthly Review - 1975-1994
What "Anarchismo" is and how it functions
In 1972 the group working in Catania around the bookshop and publishing group ‘Libreria Underground’ began the publication of a newspaper Sinistra Libertaria which was to become a periodical but which was immediately condemned by the hostility and incomprehension of certain comrades, and by the police and judicial repression.
With the intention of continuing this endeavour, the first number of Anarchismo, a bimonthly review, was published in 1975, an instrument for the clarficiation of essential theoretical problems arising from certain concrete situations. The aim of the editorial group is that of maintaining the review at a sufficiently high level of analysis, while avoiding falling into theory for the sake of theory, and of building a coherent discourse capable of bringing out the true matrix of anarchism, which is not merely a negative vacuum, but is analytical penetration for the struggle, a precise direction of thought maintained constant even when it might be disagreeable.
The work in these last two years of activity has been addressed towards a study of the problem of anarchist organisation and the critical re-examination of past structures which often turn out to be inadequate for the present time, against any authoritarian contamination these structures might assume, derived from platformist positions in turn produced from the disillusionment of a certain historical moment and not valid in absolute; a critical examination of anarcho-syndicalist formulae and a more profound study of the authoritarian inconvenience they can determine; towards workers’ autonomy, constructing beginning from the base on the foundation of self-management of the struggle and of production (when possible); for direct action in the struggle in the factories, on the land, the universities and living areas, as well as in the sense of the armed defence of these struggles.
Furthermore, we have attempted to carry out an open-minded research of the experience of others, Also Marxists, because we are sure of the validity of an anarchist libertarian methodology which rejects badly construed structures such as libertarian marxism, but do not close our eyes before the reality of concrete struggles whose patrimony must not be lost. Finally, our work seeks to revalue anarchist pluralism, the vision of life and methodology of struggle which seems to us the most valid for the realisation of the future social revolution.
“Anarchismo” editorial group
With the intention of continuing this endeavour, the first number of Anarchismo, a bimonthly review, was published in 1975, an instrument for the clarficiation of essential theoretical problems arising from certain concrete situations. The aim of the editorial group is that of maintaining the review at a sufficiently high level of analysis, while avoiding falling into theory for the sake of theory, and of building a coherent discourse capable of bringing out the true matrix of anarchism, which is not merely a negative vacuum, but is analytical penetration for the struggle, a precise direction of thought maintained constant even when it might be disagreeable.
The work in these last two years of activity has been addressed towards a study of the problem of anarchist organisation and the critical re-examination of past structures which often turn out to be inadequate for the present time, against any authoritarian contamination these structures might assume, derived from platformist positions in turn produced from the disillusionment of a certain historical moment and not valid in absolute; a critical examination of anarcho-syndicalist formulae and a more profound study of the authoritarian inconvenience they can determine; towards workers’ autonomy, constructing beginning from the base on the foundation of self-management of the struggle and of production (when possible); for direct action in the struggle in the factories, on the land, the universities and living areas, as well as in the sense of the armed defence of these struggles.
Furthermore, we have attempted to carry out an open-minded research of the experience of others, Also Marxists, because we are sure of the validity of an anarchist libertarian methodology which rejects badly construed structures such as libertarian marxism, but do not close our eyes before the reality of concrete struggles whose patrimony must not be lost. Finally, our work seeks to revalue anarchist pluralism, the vision of life and methodology of struggle which seems to us the most valid for the realisation of the future social revolution.
“Anarchismo” editorial group
“Anarchismo” through analytical articles, documents and book reviews, carried forward in the revolutionary movement a projectual discourse orientated towards permanent conflictuality, autonomous action and attack. Small actions of attack, spread throughout the territory, represented and continue to represent today, a proposal of method for who, pushed by a situation of oppression and illbeing, decides autonomously to insurge refusing to delegate the practical realisation of this need to any authoritarian, institutional or supposedly revolutionary structure.
36
clik to read index
38
clik to read index
53-54
41
clik to read index
40
clik to read index
72
clik to read index
44
clik to read index
42
clik to read index
30
clik to read index
71
clik to read index
43
clik to read index
74
47
15
59